How Fashion’s Relationship With Buy Now, Pay Later Is Changing



When fashion tastemakers file into the Revolve Gallery during New York Fashion Week, the online retailer expects that splashy displays by labels like Aya Muse, Kim Shui and Michael Costello will inspire them to snap up hundreds of thousands of dollars in merchandise.

For Revolve, what they don’t see is equally important.

The installation is doubling as the debut of a new checkout process, a product created by technology service provider Bolt, where QR codes on clothing tags direct customers to the retailer’s website to complete their purchases with one click. The hope is shoppers will find the process easier to navigate, increasing the odds they complete their purchase. And crucially, they’ll bypass the crowded checkout pages — with tempting logos for “buy-now, pay-later” services — that have become increasingly common on retail websites.

Over the last three years, instalment payment services became ubiquitous on fashion retailers’ checkout pages. Buy now pay later brought in new customers, who spent more knowing they could spread out payments over weeks or months.

Some retailers are having second thoughts about that relationship, however. Klarna, Affirm and Afterpay have seen valuations plummet amid new regulations and rising borrowing costs. These concerns have been amplified as the fintech firms have sought to become consumer brands themselves. The biggest advertise heavily (Afterpay is the lead sponsor of New York Fashion Week as well as London Fashion Week under its UK subsidiary, Clearpay).

In fashion, companies are nervous about allowing yet another intermediary to have dibs on data about their customers and transactions — similar concerns have kept many brands off of Amazon and other e-commerce sites.

“We may not have been willing to partner with Bolt if they hadn’t been so flexible with us in terms of being able to access the data that we felt like we needed to access and own the data that we felt like we needed to own,” said Revolve co-chief executive and co-founder Mike Karanikolas.

Trade Off

Retailers have always relied on outside companies to handle complicated back-office functions, such as logistics. But with the rise of e-commerce, services firms have become more involved in the customer relationship, with BNPL as the latest example. The benefits are obvious, the costs sometimes only become clear later, said Hemal Nagarsheth, partner in the financial services practise at business consultancy Kearney.

“BNPL partnerships can get you access to capabilities around things like technology and a seamless checkout experience — which are super important,” Nagarsheth said. “The question that some retailers have not had a chance to discuss … is how to treat that relationship and what data should and shouldn’t get shared.”

For instance, when a consumer opts to check out with Afterpay, they are taken to the BNPL firm’s website to complete the transaction. Afterpay — or Klarna, Affirm, or most other instalment plan companies — may then own valuable information about who that customer is, as well as broader data on shopping habits. They can use this data to develop relationships of their own with consumers — Klarna even has a “super app” where customers can browse retailers’ websites and make purchases without leaving the fintech firm’s ecosystem.

“There’s this idea that retail is at the centre of everything that the consumer does,” said Deborah Weinswig, the founder and chief executive of Coresight Research. “I think in some ways, many consumers feel much better about that as opposed to solution providers having all [their] data.”

From Frictionless to Invisible

What many fashion companies now want from third party vendors is the frictionless solutions they promise all while staying invisible, experts say.

“The future is to keep lowering friction, make things really fast and really transparent,” said Keval Desai, a former Google executive and founder of SHAKTI, an early stage tech venture capital firm. “The more transactions you enable, the more money you make … instead of doing that, fintech companies have been doing all kinds of gymnastics.”

At its NFYW gallery, Revolve will also become the first to use Bolt’s latest product, Checkout Links, which allows shoppers to to check out with a single click wherever they discover a product, whether online (like in an email or blog post from a brand) or offline (such as at a NYFW pop-up, a trade show or in a store.)

Revolve still offers BNPL options on its website, with Bolt acting as “a layer on top of all the different payment options,” giving the retailer access to more data, said Maju Kuruvilla, Bolt’s chief executive officer.

“Merchants are in this tough space where they’re trying to meet the customer where they are and the customers are using all these different alternate payment options,” said Kuruvilla. “But then, now that they’ve enabled all these options, merchants start [wondering] ‘who owns my customer and where is my data?’”

Even complementary solutions like Bolt aren’t without their kinks. In July, licensing company Authentic Brands Group settled a lawsuit against Bolt that alleged the online checkout service provider breached its contract and failed to deliver its payment software as promised and then changed the terms of their equity deal. As part of the settlement, ABG became shareholders of the fintech startup.

Like Bolt, other firms are looking for ways to offer BNPL-like services while leaving the retailer in charge of the customer relationship. Splitit, for example, allows consumers to turn large purchases into monthly instalments using their credit cards.

More traditional banks like Barclays and HSBC Bank, are also starting to build out buy-now pay-later options, as are credit card companies and payment processors such as Paypal. That can help allay consumer fears over privacy as well as help retailers avoid the added competition from BNPL start-ups, Nagarsheth said.

“For retailers, you would not consider a bank a competitor and, for consumers … they trust banks with their data because banks hold their money,” he said.

It’s large retailers like Revolve that are in the best position to strike a different bargain with their service providers. Many smaller retailers are focused on acquiring more customers, and are willing to sacrifice some control over the customer relationship to grow sales.

“The fight for consumer data is a very real fight,” said Nandan Sheth, chief executive of SplitIt.



Credit: Source link

Discover

19,463FansLike
232,230FollowersFollow
75,262FollowersFollow
13,828FollowersFollow
2,920SubscribersSubscribe

Sponsor

spot_imgspot_img

Latest

How to Use Performance Reviews to Keep Loyal Employees on Your Team

By Jason Bland, co-founder of Custom Legal Marketing, a law firm SEO company that helps law firms thrive in highly competitive markets.Performance reviews are...

Bitcoin Still Needs Time to Form a Resilient Bottom, Glassnode Suggests

Since bottom formation is usually characterized by long-term holders (LTHs) bearing a significant portion of the unrealized loss, the Bitcoin (BTC) market is...

Heidi Klum’s Sunscreen & Hat In ‘Allure:’ Photo – Hollywood Life

View gallery If there’s one thing for sure about Heidi Klum, it is that she is always showing off her figure on social media...

8 Of The Best Boot Laces To Ensure You’re Ready For Every Situation (Updated 2022)

We know what you’re probably thinking—laces are laces are laces are laces. But like the saying goes, the devil is in the details,...

How to Apply Foundation Like a Makeup Pro

Like most things in life, there are steps to mastering perfection. Babies have to crawl before they walk. And we have to know...
en English
X